Saturday, 3 October 2026

The Battle of Cheriton 1644

Friday saw a return to Face to Face gaming in the dungeon. I had earmarked the Battle of Cheriton as one to play when an opportunity came up, so we jumped in with both feet.

There are lots of different maps and descriptions of the battle, none agree on the numbers of troops and there appears some debate exactly which ridges the armies drew up on. The key features are the Cheriton wood which saw fierce skirmishing, the higher ground disrupted by hedges and at some point both armies are on opposing ridges.

Cheriton in our setup. The Royalists on the left under Hopton and the Parliamentary forces on the right under his friend Waller. The standard history has a numerical advantage to Waller, and it seems Hopton didn’t really intend to fight until his infantry foolishly marched off their ridge. At this point Waller seeing his chance swooped and a more general engagement ensued much of the Royalist infantry being badly cut up by Parliamentary cavalry.  I felt I needed to provide for the potential for the Royalists to move off their ridge otherwise it would be an almost impossible battle. In fact without this i doubt a battle would have taken place, the Royalist would just have moved away.

My royalist infantry had to roll at the start to see if they were impetuous enough to move forward , two regiments duly failed their tests and marched off into the valley ! My rule required them to keep moving until fired upon or attacked.

As happened historically I couldn’t just leave the infantry to be wiped out so the Royalist cavalry moves forward to support 

The Parliamentary cannons open fire in the centre

The woods at the time seem to have been fairly light so this would reduce movement and and cavalry bonuses for charging etc….unfortunately the cavalry on my right flank gets drawn into the woods where nobody can really get an advantage 

On the other wing there is a stand off , but seeing a lone cavalry unit in the centre I throw my cavalry forward, high risk but exciting and unpredictable 

Cavalry continue to skirmish in the woods unfortunately the parliamentary forces have a regiment of Cuirassiers who in the woods prove very hard to kill !

Somehow my Royalist cavalry fail to break through and the gamble doesn’t pay off a swirling cavalry battle ensues in the centre whoch can really only go one way 🙁

In for a penny the Royalist infantry in now pushing across the valley to get to grips with the rebels

Unfortunately it is too late and the Royalist cavalry is broken, with my right flank now completely exposed Hopton has no option but to concede the day and salvage as many troops as possible for another day. An entertaining battle, I didn’t roll very well at all failing on one turn to score any hits at all. The Royalists really should have stayed on their ridge but then I don’t think we would have had a battle as the Parliamentary forces probably aren’t strong enough for a frontal assault. Great to get back gaming in the dungeon.

Don’t think I had posted this but Jonathon invited me to play through his Salem Church Battle, we had a lot of fun Sedgwick did a bit better than I had expected !

Finally some nice shots from my holiday 

The Medieval gates into Verdun

Dukes of Burgundy Palace in Dijon 

Armour collection in Turin

Cittadella Viscontea di Piacenza home of the Farnese family for a while and now a series of museums

Castello di San Giorgio, part of the Ducal palace and now also a series of museums

The Sforza Castle in Milan, guess what a series of museums

Arco della Pace in Milan, started by Napoleon when he conquered Italy, but not completed by him so the inscriptions etc are dedicated to the Congress of Vienna after Napoleons downfall.

Amiens Cathederal and a beer 

That’s it for now another game on the table so another game to post in the next few days.

Thanks as always for popping by

Matt ❤️



36 comments:

  1. Awesome looking game and outdoor scenes, Matt. The To Kill a King P&S supplement has a scenario for this battle - may have to try it out someday.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Dean I always spend a bit of time looking in the internet for scenarios but didn’t find too much for Cheriton which slightly surprised me. I’ll see if I can find that version. The challenge in my view for this battle is it’s not clear who should attack as neither side has a big advantage in numbers and as I mentioned in the post I think with out the ‘mistake’ by the royalist infantry I don’t think a battle would have occurred at all ?

      Delete
  2. Will you stop posting your holiday photos Matt. I am REALLY green with envy. 😉
    Your table for Cheriton looks great. I’ve not seen that map before. Think it’s the first one I’ve seen that shows the spur of high ground coming from the wood between the two ridges. It’s really obvious when you walk the ground but it never gets considered in any accounts.
    Chris/Nundanket

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sorry about the photos Chris I’m nearly run out. Interesting about the ridges, I read several briefish accounts of the battle and none really seem to agree completely.

      Delete
    2. I gather that the original sources are either vague, confusing or contradictory. So it’s not surprising there’s not a consensus. There’s supposed to have been a new book out (Serena Jones?) which has evidence from artefacts that support the traditional hypothesis but it’s been years since it was announced and it still hasn’t been published as far as I can see.
      Sorry for the long comment. It’s a bit of a hobby horse.
      Chris

      Delete
    3. Thanks Chris long comments are fine, a subject I suspect you know much better than I. I saw something on the internet about archeology but that was delving too deep for what I needed. My battles tend away from exact recreations rather they are inspired by history 🙂

      Delete
  3. Great post Matt, looks like you are having fun on your travels and on the gaming table. Cheers Stu

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Stu we had a hoot on holiday and a lot of fun, now back to gaming 👍

      Delete
  4. Cheriton looks magnificent Matt. Great to see the ECW collection in action. I love the irony of the inscription on the Arco della Pace. I wonder if that will happen to the Arc de Trump, if he doesn't manage to get it finished within the next couple of years?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Lawrence, I think I read the arch is actually pointed such that the road heads directly to Paris as that is what Nap wanted !

      Delete
  5. Hi Matt, The battlefield looks great, with the field systems giving particular eye catching terrain to fight over. I recently bought the Pike & Shotte at a good price ... Oh No! :-)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Norm I’m certainly happy with the look and feel of the ECW collection. Buying the battle box is a great way to start but a bit daunting until you’ve got a handful of units under your belt. You can cut corners on the painting and they look just fine.

      Delete
  6. Super looking table and great to see the ECW collection on the table, really enjoyed seeing it Matt.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Donnie fun to get the ECW on the table, hopefully back out soonish ?

      Delete
  7. Another handsome looking table and an enjoyable battle to follow. I have played Cheriton many times and the battle is always worth refighting. Really enjoy seeing more of your recent travel photos. One day I will get around to my account of our Salem Church game. Spinning is a tough job!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Jon a fun battle, I might search your blog to check out a version of Cheriton we will certainly play it again sometime.

      Delete
  8. Replies
    1. Thanks Neil we haven’t seen your ECW boys for a while ?

      Delete
  9. Splendid write-up, Matt! The ECW collection and terrain look fantastic on the table, and those travel photos are brilliant. Great report!

    All the best, Andy

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Many thanks Andy a fun battle and hard fought 👍

      Delete
  10. A splendid ECW tussle there Matt. Interesting pictures from your trip too.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks David, I’m sure people have had enough of my holidays so that might be the end of the holiday snaps ?

      Delete
  11. Looks like you had a fantastic trip & not seeing any photos of you wielding an umbrella so the weather must have been good also. Which rules are you using for your ECW battles? Or do you have several that you enjoy & mix it up each game?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Terry only one day of proper rain for the morning at Solferino. As to rules we are using Kings of War, slightly adapted with some house rules to make it slightly more ECW specific.

      Delete
  12. Back in the swing, splendid stuff all round!

    ReplyDelete
  13. A great looking game and a win for the forces of liberty and progress - hurrah (sorry, Matt!). Some more lovely holiday shots, too.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Keith ‘liberty and progress’ where did it all go wrong I wonder.

      Delete
  14. Lovely photos and a great looking battle, in a war without an enemy incompetence leads to a rash decision,followed by defeat, very good for period!
    Best Iain

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Iain, a fun battle and as so often happens our game reflected history. If I had been able to stay on the hill I wonder if different result would have occurred ?

      Delete
  15. The Battle of Cheriton looked really good, Warlord Epic I assume. Like you I sometimes make up scenario specific rules to bring out historic features in ECW games, and add to the fun.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Rob, yes the vast majority of the core figures are Warlord Epic, although hiding in the cavalry are quite lot of Peter Pig, and some other bits and pieces like the commanders 👍

      Delete
  16. Splendid game there Matt:)! Like many battles, it can be hard to get consensus on numbers, deployments etc, so I tend to go with what works for me and the rules I'm using. Love the holiday shots and in the '80's we were in Milan with Uni and took time to see the museum, which was pretty damned impressive from memory.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Missed this, looks good Matt, still out of things here.

    ReplyDelete